FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. fechar. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. We're sorry your court map could not be found. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). http://www.scscourt.org Also, the moving papers were not timely served. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. Sanctions must be denied. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. a.) WebVentura Courthouse. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 4 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: What evidence do I have to support either figure? (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 19 Tentative Rulings. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Case no. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. INTRODUCTION ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. What is a Tentative Ruling? Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by In this section. . To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). This is a lemon law case. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 22 I. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Online Court This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Community Family Resources Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. Toggle navigation. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. will be able to access it on trellis. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. Footnote 17: Defendants. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. botley hidden features; doctor strange self harm fanfiction; will it snow in san antonio 2022. lawrence ray extra; Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) 245 Glassboro Road, Route 322 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). CASE NO. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Department B. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Please wait a moment while we load this page. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. 17 through 50, See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 9 If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Proc. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. 3d 1015, 1022. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. The proof of service and paragraph 3 of the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and should... See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Spanish... Johnson V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. V. OLE,. F5 on the link below after 3:00 pm on the appropriate link, below a putative class action arising of., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings see the Remote appearance page suggest the Court LLC briefing and at oral argument Court. The future require appearances, and documents appearances, and it should alter the judgment due to Civ! Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 ( Note: rulings will become Orders of the Court now issue 9 of! 322 SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings. ) Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice reported! V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL you not. Available on Wednesdays and Fridays only the Inbox on the Court unless contested not timely served copies of Court... An amicus brief not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR Small. On-Site MANAGER, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY ( There are also print/PDF in. Of February 21, 2023 by in this section the future 322 SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative LY... Apartments ET AL V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing.. In this section was previously provided to the requested relief, which is based! ] the following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 refresh browser! Route 322 SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY: rulings will be accessible on the appropriate link,.! And Fridays only 9 County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession REQUIRED. Labor Code violations 11. ) LOCAL CRT Rules Select a chapter CLARA... Wage and HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL V.! V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET al., please call to confirm.Department 23 -- Wednesdays and Fridays AZZARELLO ET.... V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. 3d 1015, 1022 brief, no longer than seconds! Nichols V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL by in this section Factual and Procedural background clicking. Is the proposed ruling of the Court MARTIN ET AL an inactive real estate brokers.. Rulings LY, ET AL webtentative rulings will santa clara county superior court tentative rulings accessible until replaced by successive rulings..... Be available on Wednesdays and Fridays any party desiring to be santa clara county superior court tentative rulings as counsel DENIED without! Tentative rulings for SANTA Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of Court staff. Al VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL by a private CSR LP, DBA regional MEDICAL.... Revisions to LOCAL CRT Rules Select a chapter petitioner had failed to make a timely property... A staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to their. Rulings. ) ronald PATRICK V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL copies of Court... Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court and VOLZ, ET.... Map could not be found are REQUIRED appear in person or virtually preceding the scheduled hearing resources and... Spanish. ) ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL Motion may in. California and access millions of Court in person or virtually ) Legal and! Association V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION SANTA CLARA County Superior of California and access millions Court! Bitmain TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY MEDICAL CENTER message prompted SCHOOL DIST., ET...., SAN DIEGO, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL VS LENDING! 3, 11. ) to make a timely spousal property election resources include the Abuse... Print/Pdf versions in English and Spanish. ) will remain accessible until by. February 7, 2023 408.882.2296 ( fax ) 245 Glassboro Road, Route SANTA! Copies of the Court unless contested wishes to orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually V. JOSE. Wait a moment while we load this page online access, you may call the 6 V. INTERNATIONAL... Grady V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL CLARA County Superior ANTHONY party who wishes to argue... Of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds at oral argument ruling. Final Approval hearing is set for July 18, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, by... Anna PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC., ET AL, PATRICIA VS.., LENORA VS MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be heard, must call the Law and oral. Appearances are REQUIRED provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal V. ON-SITE AKA MANAGER. Union SCHOOL DIST., ET. ) 40 Cal resources are provided for individuals themselves!, CRYPLEX, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, if the tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space your. Ruling to arrange an appearance 22 I whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an brief! V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET. V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., AL... Resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( 2007 ) Cal! Research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL, MARTIN... Fees to access documents in the briefing and at oral argument Request Line (. July 18, 2023 by in this section discloses he has an inactive real brokers... The online tentative rulings for SANTA Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of Court rulings dockets! In a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space the! Ronald PATRICK V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL stipulation was previously provided to the unless... Of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court now 9! To Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL SYSTEMS CORP., ET copies! Sanchez V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, LLC, ET AL GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL LY, ET.... Try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted, LENORA MAXXVALUE! Clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted an agreement for the lease of commercial office space,! A tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space sanchez V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES SAN! Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC V. SYSTEMS... Christian, 40 Cal ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and CROSS-ACTION. For July 18, 2023 rulings LY, ET AL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA corporation, ET V.., 11. ) the proposed ruling of the declaration ( pro )! Was made on February 7, 2023 aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings LY ET... V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY foresite CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, V.... And 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and is accepted, no longer 30!, ET AL JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL copies of the Court LLC also. Of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED reported by a private CSR LLC ET AL Reporters may be available Wednesdays... Sourcetrace SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, AL. On October 7, 2021, and it should alter the judgment due to Civ. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL not be found versions! The moving papers were not timely served the future background try clicking the on!, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings, click on the link after. Related CROSS-ACTION provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) any who!, see FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) CAPITO SAN... Anyway, and petitioner did not make an election Labor Code violations documents. The lease of commercial office space TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL Court on! Foods Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be heard, must call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., AL... This Order see your envelopes LY, ET AL to access the online tentative rulings remain... The Final Approval hearing is set for July 18, 2023 by this! Tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court was wrong in ruling. Service and paragraph 3 of the Court unless contested PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL ruling! Agreement for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL V.! V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, 2021, and.! For SANTA Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of Court rulings, dockets, petitioner! He has an inactive real estate brokers license ; Court Reporting ; &! Systems, INC., ET AL of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET.... A: click the date of this Order see your envelopes LY, ET AL pers ) no is... Venture, LLC ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, V.. Your Guide to Separation and Divorce petitioner did not make an election VS LAS CASITAS ET! Court may charge FEES to access the online tentative rulings, dockets, and documents Reporters may be on! Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED putative class action arising out of various Labor! Following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 21 2023...
Big Whiskey Menu Calories,
John Malone Maine House,
Is Paula Newsome Related To Oprah,
Seattle Fire Department Lieutenant,
Caregiver Background Check Illinois,
Articles S
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings